Case study
Night setback that never happened
Energy & electricityBulk Handling & Rail Logistics
The overnight setback had silently stopped working, and it was worth about a third of the load.
A distribution facility’s overnight setback showed as active in its automation schedule, but electrical demand stayed high. We use the HVAC demand trace to check the schedule’s effect and flag nights when the expected reduction fails to appear.
What the data showed
Explore the chart to inspect the readings.
| Interval | HVAC feed (kW) |
|---|---|
| 00:00 | 114 |
| 00:30 | 113 |
| 01:00 | 111 |
| 01:30 | 117 |
| 02:00 | 113 |
| 02:30 | 115 |
| 03:00 | 116 |
| 03:30 | 115 |
| 04:00 | 114 |
| 04:30 | 115 |
| 05:00 | 115 |
| 05:30 | 115 |
| 06:00 | 131 |
| 06:30 | 133 |
| 07:00 | 131 |
| 07:30 | 131 |
| 08:00 | 135 |
| 08:30 | 131 |
| 09:00 | 135 |
| 09:30 | 134 |
| 10:00 | 129 |
| 10:30 | 133 |
| 11:00 | 133 |
| 11:30 | 132 |
| 12:00 | 131 |
| 12:30 | 129 |
| 13:00 | 133 |
| 13:30 | 131 |
| 14:00 | 134 |
| 14:30 | 135 |
| 15:00 | 135 |
| 15:30 | 129 |
| 16:00 | 129 |
| 16:30 | 134 |
| 17:00 | 131 |
| 17:30 | 134 |
| 18:00 | 116 |
| 18:30 | 112 |
| 19:00 | 116 |
| 19:30 | 117 |
| 20:00 | 113 |
| 20:30 | 113 |
| 21:00 | 111 |
| 21:30 | 116 |
| 22:00 | 115 |
| 22:30 | 117 |
| 23:00 | 112 |
| 23:30 | 117 |
| Before | A schedule that was believed to be working |
|---|---|
| After | A schedule that is measured, and alerts when it is not |
Background
A distribution warehouse uses an overnight setback schedule for its heating, ventilation and air conditioning. The schedule is intended to reduce demand during the quieter period. Our monitoring follows the electrical feeds to the HVAC equipment so the team can see how the equipment actually runs through the night.
The problem
The automation schedule reports that setback is active. The electrical trace shows a different pattern, night after night. Because the setting still appears to be in place, the team has little reason to revisit it from the schedule alone. The missing reduction stays hidden until actual demand is compared with the expected overnight behaviour.
How we found it
We use current transformers on the main HVAC feeds and follow demand at minute resolution. The trace shows whether the expected change occurs when the schedule calls for setback. Overnight baseline alerts draw attention to demand that remains above the expected level, giving the team a particular night and period to investigate.
What changed
The setback schedule is restored, reducing the overnight electrical load. Its effect is now measured as well as scheduled. The team can follow the demand trace after the change and receive an alert when the expected overnight pattern fails to appear, rather than relying on the control setting as confirmation.
The lesson
Check the schedule against actual electrical demand. Use the overnight baseline to confirm that setback continues working after changes to the schedule or equipment.
What changed
Before
A schedule that was believed to be working
After
A schedule that is measured, and alerts when it is not
~35%of overnight electrical load
Recovered by restoring a setback schedule that had failed silently.
Where to go next
Energy & electricityManufacturing: automotive, plastics & rubber
Three factories, one unit of production, one outlier
A manufacturer with three factories
Same product, same equipment, and one factory used about 40% more energy per unit.
~40%more energy per unit
Cooling towersEnergy & electricityFood & beverage processingControlled environment agriculture (greenhouses)
Refrigeration condenser fouling detection
A food storage and processing site
Head pressure rose while load remained constant, revealing condenser fouling and quantifying its energy cost.
Head pressurevs. load
See where monitoring could help your facility.
Our team will walk your facility with you and identify where monitoring could help.
Book a site visitAll case studies
or call 1-833-QUANTFY (1-833-782-6839)
