Case study
Chiller circuit leak isolated without a shutdown
WaterManufacturing: automotive, plastics & rubber
Continuous monitoring helped identify and isolate a leaking cooling loop while the production line remained in operation.
A cooling system was taking in more make-up water than expected, with several circuits sharing the total. We compare the circuits separately to identify the leaking loop and keep production running while the repair is planned.
What the data showed
Explore the chart to inspect the readings.
| Interval | Loop A (L/h) | Loop B (L/h) | Loop C (L/h) |
|---|---|---|---|
| D1 0:00 | 21 | 21 | 23 |
| D1 4:00 | 21 | 19 | 26 |
| D1 8:00 | 24 | 19 | 27 |
| D1 12:00 | 20 | 19 | 32 |
| D1 16:00 | 24 | 21 | 36 |
| D1 20:00 | 22 | 17 | 36 |
| D2 0:00 | 22 | 21 | 39 |
| D2 4:00 | 21 | 18 | 40 |
| D2 8:00 | 25 | 21 | 45 |
| D2 12:00 | 20 | 20 | 45 |
| D2 16:00 | 20 | 20 | 53 |
| D2 20:00 | 25 | 20 | 52 |
| D3 0:00 | 22 | 18 | 55 |
| D3 4:00 | 22 | 21 | 57 |
| D3 8:00 | 24 | 18 | 60 |
| D3 12:00 | 20 | 17 | 61 |
| D3 16:00 | 20 | 18 | 67 |
| D3 20:00 | 24 | 20 | 69 |
| D4 0:00 | 24 | 17 | 72 |
| D4 4:00 | 23 | 20 | 74 |
| D4 8:00 | 23 | 17 | 78 |
| D4 12:00 | 21 | 20 | 78 |
| D4 16:00 | 24 | 19 | 82 |
| D4 20:00 | 23 | 20 | 81 |
| D5 0:00 | 20 | 17 | 88 |
| D5 4:00 | 22 | 18 | 87 |
| D5 8:00 | 20 | 19 | 90 |
| D5 12:00 | 21 | 19 | 94 |
| D5 16:00 | 20 | 19 | 95 |
| D5 20:00 | 23 | 18 | 100 |
| D6 0:00 | 24 | 20 | 102 |
| D6 4:00 | 20 | 20 | 103 |
| D6 8:00 | 20 | 19 | 105 |
| D6 12:00 | 22 | 17 | 111 |
| D6 16:00 | 20 | 19 | 113 |
| D6 20:00 | 22 | 20 | 115 |
| D7 0:00 | 20 | 19 | 119 |
| D7 4:00 | 23 | 20 | 122 |
| D7 8:00 | 23 | 20 | 122 |
| D7 12:00 | 22 | 19 | 125 |
| D7 16:00 | 21 | 20 | 129 |
| D7 20:00 | 21 | 17 | 129 |
| Before | One aggregate make-up figure, four candidate circuits |
|---|---|
| After | One circuit named, isolated and repaired on a planned outage |
Background
An automotive factory depends on several cooling circuits to support production. The system is a closed loop, yet it keeps taking in more make-up water than expected. The facility team can see the overall demand, but the total leaves them with several possible places to start looking.
The problem
The incoming make-up figure combines the circuits. A change in that total says something needs attention without showing which loop is responsible. Investigating the whole system takes the team away from the specific fault, and stopping production to search would add another problem to the water loss.
How we found it
We put the comparison at circuit level, using submeters on each make-up line. The dashboard follows the readings together so the team can see where demand diverges. Threshold alerts draw attention to an increasing make-up rate. A circuit that continues taking water stands out against the others, giving maintenance a defined loop to investigate.
What changed
The leaking circuit can be named and isolated while the production line remains in operation. The repair then fits into a planned outage. Instead of working through every possible circuit from an aggregate reading, the team has a specific location and a trace showing why it needs attention.
The lesson
Submetering directs maintenance to the circuit responsible for unexpected water demand, so the team can plan work around production. Keep the separate traces visible after the repair to check the result and watch for another change.
What changed
Before
One aggregate make-up figure, four candidate circuits
After
One circuit named, isolated and repaired on a planned outage
1 loopisolated
Identified by sub-meter divergence, with no production stoppage.
Where to go next
Cooling towersWaterManufacturing: automotive, plastics & rubberBuilding Materials, Concrete & Aggregates
Cooling tower blowdown optimization
A plastics manufacturing factory
Blowdown was controlled by a timer rather than conductivity, causing usable water to be discharged unnecessarily.
1 setpointchanged
WaterFood & beverage processing
Water running through an idle factory all weekend
A food processing factory
Water still running through an empty factory all weekend, worth about a fifth of the monthly bill.
~20%of the monthly water bill
Predictive maintenanceWaterBreweries & Beverage
A failing diaphragm pump, caught before it failed
Carlsberg Canada
A transfer line's flow signature drifted, the alert fired, and the diaphragm was replaced on a schedule instead of during a shutdown.
Scheduledreplacement
See where monitoring could help your facility.
Our team will walk your facility with you and identify where monitoring could help.
Book a site visitAll case studies
or call 1-833-QUANTFY (1-833-782-6839)
